Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
biorxiv; 2024.
Preprint in English | bioRxiv | ID: ppzbmed-10.1101.2024.02.23.581661

ABSTRACT

COVID-19, caused by SARS-CoV-2, is associated with arterial and venous thrombosis, thereby increasing mortality. SARS-CoV-2 spike protein (SP), a viral envelope structural protein, is implicated in COVID-19-associated thrombosis. However, the underlying mechanisms remain unknown. Thymidine phosphorylase (TYMP), a newly identified prothrombotic protein, is upregulated in the plasma, platelets, and lungs of patients with COVID-19 but its role in COVID-19-associated thrombosis is not defined. In this study, we found that wild-type SARS-CoV-2 SP significantly promoted arterial thrombosis in K18-hACE2TG mice. SP-accelerated thrombosis was attenuated by inhibition or genetic ablation of TYMP. SP increased the expression of TYMP, resulting in the activation of signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) in BEAS-2B cells, a human bronchial epithelial cell line. A siRNA-mediated knockdown of TYMP inhibited SP-enhanced activation of STAT3. Platelets derived from SP-treated K18-hACE2TG mice also showed increased STAT3 activation, which was reduced by TYMP deficiency. Activated STAT3 is known to potentiate glycoprotein VI signaling in platelets. While SP did not influence ADP- or collagen-induced platelet aggregation, it significantly shortened activated partial thromboplastin time and this change was reversed by TYMP knockout. Additionally, platelet factor 4 (PF4) interacts with SP, which also complexes with TYMP. TYMP enhanced the formation of the SP/PF4 complex, which may potentially augment the prothrombotic and procoagulant effects of PF4. We conclude that SP upregulates TYMP expression, and TYMP inhibition or knockout mitigates SP-enhanced thrombosis. These findings indicate that inhibition of TYMP may be a novel therapeutic strategy for COVID-19-associated thrombosis.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Thrombosis , Blood Platelet Disorders , Venous Thrombosis
2.
researchsquare; 2023.
Preprint in English | PREPRINT-RESEARCHSQUARE | ID: ppzbmed-10.21203.rs.3.rs-2697304.v1

ABSTRACT

Background With remote learning during the COVID-19 pandemic came behavioral changes such as increased screen time and decreased outdoor time. This unprecedented situation grants itself to the study of the association of environmental factors on the worsening burden of myopia in children. Hence, this study aimed to investigate the association between behavioral changes caused by the COVID-19 pandemic and myopia progression in children.Methods This was a retrospective observational study performed among 2,064 patients ages 2–17 with cycloplegic refractions in the years 2019–2021 at a single tertiary children’s hospital. Exclusion criteria were a medical history of relevant connective tissue diseases, pseudophakia, and aphakia.Results The overall cohort (n = 2,064) had a mean spherical equivalent (SE) of 0.12 ± 3.70 D in 2019, -0.07 ± 3.95 D in 2020, and − 0.49 ± 3.85 D in 2021. The change in mean SE (0.42 D) from 2020–2021 was 2.2 times greater than the change (0.19 D) from 2019–2020 at baseline. In the cohort of return patients, there was a significant difference in myopic shift between years (F-ratio = 14.4, p < 0.00001), and a significant change from 2020 to 2021 (p = 0.00008) but not from 2019 to 2020. When observing the prevalence of myopia grouped by age, 8-year-old and 17-year-old patients had the greatest increase compared to baseline. When grouped by refractive error, low myopia children (-0.5 D to -3.00 D) displayed the greatest change in mean SE 2020–2021.Conclusions There was a substantial increase in myopia progression for children in the Chicagoland area after the period of COVID-19 changes. These findings may be explained by the behavioral changes of home confinement and online learning during the pandemic.


Subject(s)
Pseudophakia , Aphakia , Epilepsy, Complex Partial , COVID-19 , Myopia
3.
medrxiv; 2022.
Preprint in English | medRxiv | ID: ppzbmed-10.1101.2022.05.26.22275279

ABSTRACT

Background: The limited variation observed among SARS-CoV-2 consensus sequences makes it difficult to reconstruct transmission linkages in outbreak settings. Previous studies have recovered variation within individual SARS-CoV-2 infections but have not yet measured the informativeness of within-host variation for transmission inference. Methods: We performed tiled amplicon sequencing on 307 SARS-CoV-2 samples from four prospective studies and combined sequence data with household membership data, a proxy for transmission linkage. Results: Consensus sequences from households had limited diversity (mean pairwise distance, 3.06 SNPs; range, 0-40). Most (83.1%, 255/307) samples harbored at least one intrahost single nucleotide variant (iSNV; median: 117; IQR: 17-208), when applying a liberal minor allele frequency of 0.5% and prior to filtering. A mean of 15.4% of within-host iSNVs were recovered one day later. Pairs in the same household shared significantly more iSNVs (mean: 1.20 iSNVs; 95% CI: 1.02-1.39) than did pairs in different households infected with the same viral clade (mean: 0.31 iSNVs; 95% CI: 0.28-0.34), a signal that increases with increasingly liberal thresholds. Conclusions: Although only a subset of within-host variation is consistently shared across likely transmission pairs, shared iSNVs may augment the information in consensus sequences for predicting transmission linkages.


Subject(s)
Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome
4.
medrxiv; 2021.
Preprint in English | medRxiv | ID: ppzbmed-10.1101.2021.07.20.21260892

ABSTRACT

Using face mask bioaerosol sampling, we found substantial variation between individuals in SARS-CoV-2 copies exhaled over a 15-minute period, which moderately correlated with nasal swab viral load. Talking was associated with a median of 2 log10 greater exhaled viral copies. Exposure varies substantially between individuals but may be risk stratified by nasal swab viral load and whether the exposure involved conversation.

5.
medrxiv; 2021.
Preprint in English | medRxiv | ID: ppzbmed-10.1101.2021.04.26.21256131

ABSTRACT

BackgroundGiven the persistence of viral RNA in clinically recovered COVID-19 patients, subgenomic RNAs (sgRNA) have been reported as potential molecular viability markers for SARS-CoV-2. However, few data are available on their longitudinal kinetics, compared with genomic RNA (gRNA), in clinical samples. MethodsWe analyzed 536 samples from 205 patients with COVID-19 from placebo-controlled, outpatient trials of Peginterferon Lambda-1a (Lambda; n=177) and favipiravir (n=359). Nasal swabs were collected at three time points in the Lambda (Day 1, 4 and 6) and favipiravir (Day 1, 5, and 10) trials. N-gene gRNA and sgRNA were quantified by RT-qPCR. To investigate the decay kinetics in vitro, we measured gRNA and sgRNA in A549ACE2+ cells infected with SARS-CoV-2, following treatment with remdesivir or DMSO control. ResultsAt six days in the Lambda trial and ten days in the favipiravir trial, sgRNA remained detectable in 51.6% (32/62) and 49.5% (51/106) of the samples, respectively. Cycle threshold (Ct) values for gRNA and sgRNA were highly linearly correlated (Pearsons r=0.87) and the rate of increase did not differ significantly in Lambda (1.36 cycles/day vs 1.36 cycles/day; p = 0.97) or favipiravir (1.03 cycles/day vs 0.94 cycles/day; p=0.26) trials. From samples collected 15-21 days after symptom onset, sgRNA was detectable in 48.1% (40/83) of participants. In SARS-CoV-2 infected A549ACE2+ cells treated with remdesivir, the rate of Ct increase did not differ between gRNA and sgRNA. ConclusionsIn clinical samples and in vitro, sgRNA was highly correlated with gRNA and did not demonstrate different decay patterns to support its application as a viability marker. SummaryWe observed prolonged detection of subgenomic RNA in nasal swabs and equivalent decay rates to genomic RNA in both longitudinal nasal swabs and in remdesivir-treated A549ACE2+ cells infected with SARS-CoV-2. Taken together, these findings suggest that subgenomic RNA from SARS-CoV-2 is comparably stable to genomic RNA and that its detection is therefore not a more reliable indicator of replicating virus.


Subject(s)
COVID-19
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL